ClearState
Pre-execution decision authorization

Right now, somewhere in your operations team, a booking confirmation, a payment release, or a credit decision is sitting in someone's inbox. The data is there. The mandate exists. But no one can see — clearly, defensibly, retrievably — that this person is authorized to sign it under this rulebook at this moment.

So the decision waits. Or gets escalated. Or someone signs it anyway and carries the file personally if it's questioned later.

A pre-execution decision authorization layer.

Authorize the decisions that must be signed under mandate — in real time. Stop the ones that cannot be defended.

With a record you can pull up five years later — naming the decision-maker, the rulebook version, and the binding rule.

Authorization Record · sample output
{
  "decision_id":   "CS-LOGISTICS-20260504T142019Z-7K2M",
  "outcome":       "ALLOWED",
  "rulebook":      "credit-policy-v2.1",
  "binding_rule":  null,
  "authority":     "Operations Manager (T2)",
  "input_hash":    "sha256:c3af85ad...ef90",
  "timestamp":     "2026-05-04T14:20:19.342Z"
}

A signed Authorization Record. Produced before the decision executes. Kept on file for the retention period. The same input produces the same answer, every time.

What you get

Four operational consequences, made measurable at the moment of decision.

01

Decisions stop getting stuck

In a global freight forwarder, 5–10% of bookings sit in the grey zone — system warning, no block, operator judgement. 10–15% of those become problems: detention, demurrage, write-offs. At €3,000–8,000 per incident on a 25,000-shipment book, the run-rate impact runs €400,000–€1M per month — invisible until invoicing.

ClearState authorizes the bookings that satisfy mandate in real time. Stops the ones that don't, with the exact rule and the role required to escalate.

02

Authorization stops being a project

Producing a defensible decision today means after-the-fact documentation: email threads, meeting minutes, reconstruction from memory under audit.

ClearState makes authorization happen once — at decision time — and kept on file as a record. The cost of defensibility drops because the work is done in the moment, not after.

03

Mandate becomes a system, not a memory exercise

Every decision is bound to a versioned rulebook, a named decision-maker, and the active delegation level at decision time.

The accountability chain is the record itself — not a meeting minute, not "I think we discussed this", not a slide deck from six months ago. Authorization is "who was authorized to act, against what mandate, at that moment".

04

More business gets authorized — the right ones

Decisions that today get pushed into "we'll review next week" — because no one is sure they can be signed — get authorized when they actually qualify. Decisions that wouldn't survive scrutiny five years from now get stopped before they execute.

Throughput rises. Defensibility rises. Both at once.

When this decision is questioned five years from now — by an auditor, regulator, internal review, or appellant — the file shows the rulebook version, the binding rule, the named authority, and the input hash. The named decision-maker has the record they decided against. Not memory. Not reconstruction.
How it works

Two steps. One answer: ALLOWED or NOT ALLOWED.

ClearState evaluates every decision in two steps before it produces an output.

1
Step 1

Decisionability

Can this decision be taken at all? ClearState verifies that input is complete, mandate is present, and responsibility is explicitly assigned. If any required input is missing, the decision is stopped here — before any rule is applied.

2
Step 2

Rules and mandate

Is the decision permitted under the customer's defined rulebook? Each rule is bound to a versioned policy and owned by a named authority. The same input, against the same rulebook, always produces the same answer — ALLOWED or NOT ALLOWED. No AI judgement. No randomness. No third option.

Output

Authorization Record

ALLOWED, with a signed record kept on file for the retention period (typically 7 years) — or NOT ALLOWED, with a single binding reason and the action required.

Same input. Same rulebook. Same answer. Every time.

Where it applies

Operational decisions where defensibility matters at the moment of execution.

The strongest use cases today are operational: shipment booking acceptance, customs declarations, and the override decisions that sit on top of compliance flags.

Logistics & customs · primary segment

Booking acceptance, deferment declarations, sanctions overrides

At a global freight forwarder, a booking operator confirms a new shipment every few minutes. Credit limits, payment bands, sanctions flags — all visible in the Transport Management System. None of them stop the decision automatically. The system warns. It does not block. The operator decides under time pressure, with their name on the booking record.

When the customer goes bad 60–90 days later, write-off review reconstructs the file: who confirmed these last six bookings after the warning was already on the file. The defence is operator memory and judgement under pressure. The booking operator carries it personally; the Operations Manager carries the chain.

ClearState sits before that confirmation. Authorizes the bookings that satisfy credit policy and operator delegation in real time. Stops the ones that don't, with the exact rule that did not hold and the role required to escalate. The booking operator's name remains on the record — but the record is policy-authorized, not memory-defended.

The same gate applies to customs deferment declarations against guarantee envelope, and to sanctions / export-control overrides where the override authority must match the flag category and policy version — not the operator's seniority.

Other domains — same architecture, same authorization layer.

Financial services and funds

Pre-trade authorization for AIFMs (mandate compliance, look-through concentration, restricted counterparties). LP subscription eligibility (MiFID II categorization, ELTIF 2.0 suitability). Liquidity Management Tools activation (AIFMD II, CSSF documentation requirements).

Banking — credit decisions

SME credit underwriting where AI copilots produce recommendations but the credit officer carries the file. Data freshness checks, policy thresholds, AI Act Article 14 oversight requirements.

Public sector

Building permit decisions where the named officer defends the file under appeal. Plan- och bygglagen compliance, delegation-based decision authority, structural completeness before rule evaluation.

Treasury and payments

Cross-border payment release where the operator's mandate must match the transaction. Know Your Business and Know Your Transaction verification, authority chain, MiCA-aligned operational governance.

Why now

Operational cost is measurable today. Regulatory frameworks now require what good practice would demand anyway.

The cost of decisions that don't get authorized in time — pushed to manual review, escalated to leadership, or signed under pressure without record — is measurable today: in operational throughput, escalation backlog, and personal exposure when the file is later questioned. The conditions for fixing it have arrived. Regulatory frameworks now require what good operational practice would demand anyway.
EU AI Act Article 14 · in force 2 Aug 2026

Documented human oversight on AI-assisted decisions

AI-assisted decisions in regulated firms — credit underwriting, financial trading, customs classification — require documented human oversight at the moment of decision. Sanctions for non-compliance: up to €20M or 4% of global turnover. ClearState is rule-based code, not AI — and is the human-oversight layer Article 14 requires.

AIFMD II In force across EU

Authorization records on every trade

The Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive II is in force across the EU. Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF — Luxembourg), Central Bank of Ireland (CBI), and Autoriteit Financiële Markten (AFM — Netherlands) enforcement on AI governance and pre-execution authorization is intensifying. "Human judgement" is not a regulatory exemption from authorization records.

MiFID II + ELTIF 2.0 Retail distribution rules effective

Suitability and categorization

Retail-to-Professional opt-up determinations and European Long-Term Investment Fund (ELTIF) 2.0 retail distribution rules require documented suitability assessment before subscription. Mis-selling claims and regulator action increasingly target the Alternative Investment Fund Manager (AIFM) and distribution function jointly.

OFAC + EU sanctions + BIS Personal liability hardening

Sanctions enforcement at record levels

Sanctions enforcement reached record levels in 2023 ($1.5B in Office of Foreign Assets Control penalties). The 16th EU sanctions package targets transshipment, with two-thirds of listed entities outside Russia. Personal liability for senior managers is explicit in industry compliance documentation. Override decisions on partial-match flags require pre-decision authorization, not logged clicks.

Pilot offer

A 3-week engagement on your historical decisions.

We run ClearState on your actual historical decision data. The output is concrete: what would have been authorized, what would have been stopped, and why — with ready-to-review Authorization Records on real cases.

Pilot fee
€7,500 – €15,000
Duration
3 weeks · scoping to delivery
What you'll see at the end of week three
  • The exact decisions that would have been authorized — and what made each defensible: the rulebook version, the named authority, the input hash on file.
  • The exact decisions that would have been stopped — and which rule, mandate clause, or missing input triggered each block. Single binding reason per block, not a list of warnings.
  • The policy gaps your current process leaves open — where decisions are made today without clear authority, with missing inputs, or with undefined responsibility. Visible in the analysis as patterns, not as one-off cases.
  • The rate of real-time authorization vs. routed-for-review — how many of your historical decisions could have been authorized at the moment of decision rather than escalated.
What you keep

The machine-readable specification of your own policies, mandates, and rules — yours permanently. Historical ALLOWED / NOT ALLOWED outputs and Authorization Records as documented analysis.

What ClearState retains

The decision authorization pipeline — the runtime that applies the specification to new decisions in real time — is licensed by ClearState. Continued real-time authorization on future decisions requires a license.

No lock-in

If you choose not to license, you walk away with full ownership of the specification and the historical analysis. The pipeline does not continue running. 50% of the pilot fee is credited toward license if you continue.

About

A pre-execution decision authorization layer.

ClearState's architecture — Step 1 decisionability, Step 2 rules and mandate, signed Authorization Records that can be replayed years later and produce the same answer — applies to any decision where authorization must be defensible at the moment of execution rather than reconstructed afterwards.

Patent
SE 2515467-5
Filed Dec 2025
via Zacco Sweden AB
Operating entity
VND Scandinavia AB
Stockholm, Sweden
Status
Architecture built
Patent filed
~6 months to live operation

Application scenarios in active prospect dialogue across financial services, public sector, customs, and logistics. Live operation expected within ~6 months pending insurer sign-off on the originating use case.